Categories: Insights, Publications


16 Jan 2018

Loss of amenity and demotion reimbursable even based on simple presumptions and common experience (Il Quotidiano del Lavoro, 17 January 2018 – Alberto De Luca, Antonella Iacobellis)

The Court of Cassation with judgement No. 82 dated 4 January, 2018, in addressing a claim for damages due to a demotion brought before the court by a part-time employee, stated that the loss of enjoyment of life – to be understood, as any prejudice, not to be merely emotional and inner, but objectively verifiable, caused by an infringement of the individual’s non-economic sphere, taking form in the disruption of her habits and relational balance, forcing her to make different life choices in terms of expression and manifestation of her personality towards the world – must be proven before the court by the employee using all the means made available by law, among which the one that takes on major importance is the evidence by presumptions. In the specific case, loss of enjoyment of life was deemed proven having acknowledged, among other things, the length of the discomfort suffered, the awareness within the workplace and elsewhere of the occurred demotion and the frustrated legitimate expectations for career growth.

  Read here the original version of this article published on Il Quotidiano del Lavoro.
Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…