Categories: Insights, Publications


31 Jan 2019

The obligatory nature of the 231 model and the appointment of a supervisory body (Newsletter “Norme & Tributi n. 129” – Italo-German Chamber of Commerce– Vittorio De Luca, Luciano Vella)

Draft law no. 726 (the “DL”), which introduces significant changes to Italian Legislative Decree no. 231/01 is currently being examined by the Justice Committee of the Italian Senate. In particular, the DL provides that certain categories of organisation must have an organisation and management model (OMM231), and appoint a supervisory body (SB). This includes corporations and consortiums which have, even just in one of the last three financial years, reported (i) total assets on the balance sheet of at least 4,400,000 euros, or (ii) revenue from sales and services of at least 8,800,000 euros. Such entities must also file both the decision by which the SB is appointed and the decision by which the OMM231 is approved with the Chamber of Commerce within 10 days from when they are adopted, respectively. If they fail to comply, obliged companies might be ordered to pay an administrative penalty of 200,000 euros. If the DL is approved at the end of the parliamentary process, then what has until now been a right left to the discretion of individual entrepreneurs will become an obligation. In fact, with this legislative intervention, the system provided for by Italian Legislative Decree 231/01 will be strengthened, and companies that have still not complied with it will become obliged to do so. Consequently, the number of entities required to prepare an OMM231 will inevitably increase.

 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…