Categories: Insights, Case Law


1 Jan 2017

A manager must agree and confirm its leave with the employer

With its judgement no. 26464 dated 21 December 2016, the Court of Cassation confirmed that a manager must agree and confirm its leave with the employer, if this is set forth by a collective or personal contract. In the case in question a manager was dismissed for cause because he had gone on leave arbitrarily despite the fact he knew that he had to make important payments on behalf of the company for which he worked. The Court, to whom the manager had applied, considered such dismissal to be unjustified, and ordered the company to pay a supplementary indemnity to the latter, in addition to an indemnity in lieu of notice. The Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the Court only in the part relevant to the supplementary indemnity, which was rejected, but considered the dismissal to be justified even if not for cause. In rejecting the appeal of the manager, the Court of Cassation stated that the discretion of the manager to decide the period in which to go on leave is subject to the limit of a contrary provision of the collective bargaining agreement (or, as the case may be, of the personal contract) that may set forth that the employee must agree and confirm its leave with the employer. Without prejudice to the fundamental right to enjoy leave, these must be agreed, if this is expressly set forth by contract, by the parties in accordance with company requirements.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…