Categories: Insights


19 May 2015

EMPLOYERS LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENCE IN CASES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL HARASSMENT

With its ruling no. 10037/15, the Court of Cassation returned to make a decision on the issue of psychological harassment and the relative liability of the employer. The Supreme Court connects the employer’s liability for injury from psychological harassment performed by an employee to a form of negligence due to the fact that no measures were adopted aimed at eliminating the performance of the harassing initiatives. The employer’s liability is not excluded in the case where such initiatives were performed by an employer with a higher rank than the victim. The Supreme Court underlined that the duration and reiteration of the persecutory actions, combined with the procedures used by the higher-ranking manager to implement the harassing conduct, were such as to consider that the employer was aware of the hostile initiatives that the victim was subjected to. The phenomenon of psychological harassment has been the subject of many studies and research both from a medical-scientific standpoint, as well as from a strictly legal viewpoint. In terms of the Italian Civil Code, the incidence of harassment on the job is essentially due to violation of article 2087 of the Italian Civil Code. This provision forbids the employer from directly engaging in conduct that is injurious to the psychological and physical well-being of employees, but the employer also has the obligation to prevent, discourage and neutralise any harassing behaviour undertaken by higher ranking employees, people in charge or other employees in performing jobs. In light of the above, we feel it would be useful to stipulate company and/or territorial agreements, including on a voluntary basis, with codes of conduct and ethics as a guide for the conduct of employers – including based on the principles of social responsibility -, of workers and all involved subjects, in order to improve the levels of protection provided by law.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…