Categories: News, Events

Tag: Agenti di Commercio, Influencers


18 Nov 2024

HR Virtual Breakfast: “Influencers – agents: how much is an #adv likely to cost?” (De Luca & Partners e HR Capital, 26 November 2024)

A recent ruling of the Court of Rome (no. 2615, dated March 4th, 2024) addressed, for the first time in Italy, the issue of the correct legal classification of the so-called “influencers”.

According to this ruling, an influencerwho promotes a company’s products on a stable and continuous basis should be classified as an agent.

Needless to say that the aforementioned ruling has particularly significant consequences for the principal. Just to mention the main ones:

(i)          contribution charges towards Italian social security authority for agents,

(ii)        indemnities and rights provided for by the Italian Civil Code (e.g.: indemnity for termination of agency relationship, implementing Directive 86/653/CEE),

(iii)       administrative obligations,

(iv)       regularization of ongoing contracts,

(v)         management of interlocutions with Italian social security authority for agents,

(vi)       management of authorities’ inspection processes,

(vii)      need for legal assistance in disputes brought by influencers or arising out of authorities’ inspection processes.

By the way, please consider that under Italian Law, the obligation to pay social security contributions also applies to agents (and possibly to influencers) constituted as corporations.

Thanks to our in-depth experience in the field of agency law, we are at your disposal to provide you with all the support you may need for the management and resolution of issues related to the above.

If you want to delve deeper into the topic, you can read the interview published on The Platform.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…