Publications

Categories: Publications | Tag: Dismissal, Court of Cassation

According to Article 29, paragraph 2, of Legislative Decree 276/2003 (known as the “Legge Biagi”), in the context of service contracts (“contratti di appalto” in Italian parlance), the principal company or employer is jointly and severally liable with the contractor, as well as with any subcontractors, within two years after the termination of the contract, ....

Read more

Categories: Publications | Tag: GDPR, Privacy

Compliance, Agency Contracts, and Privacy Management: A Growing Complexity The law firm De Luca & Partners and HR Capital have recently highlighted significant issues in strategic areas such as contract management, regulatory compliance, and data protection. These areas, critical for Italian companies, are confronted with evolving regulations that demand increasing attention to avoid economic and ....

Read more

Categories: Publications | Tag: Dismissal, Remote working

The Italian employment sector, which has recently brought this issue back into focus in its discussions, might view this question as somewhat provocative. Under our legal system, remote working is defined as a mode of execution of the employment relationship, which is to be established through an agreement between the parties. This means that the ....

Read more

Categories: Publications | Tag: Dismissal, contracts

The Italian Court of Cassation, called upon to rule on the possibility of applying the joint and several liability provisions of Article 29 of Legislative Decree 276/2003 to service contracts other than those formally governed by Article 1655 of the Italian Civil Code (“contratti di appalto” in Italian parlance), with its recent judgment no. 26881 ....

Read more

Categories: Publications | Tag: Dismissal, Court of Cassation

The Supreme Court, by its decision no. 24473 of 12 October 2024, ruled that individual abstentions from work could not be qualified as a strike. The decision came after the rejection of the appeal filed by some employees against a disciplinary sanction imposed by a highway company following two days of unjustified absence. The Court ....

Read more