Smart woking, remote control, redundancies, target work, social shock absorbers.
More than ever the world of work is living a moment of deep change and for this reason integrated consulting becomes a real necessity.
De Luca & Partners and HR Capital since the beginning have always formed a single team of Labour Lawyers and Labour Consultants to support companies in their work.
“We play doubles on all fields”: this is the headline of our 2020 advertising campaign. After “Yes, we only think about work”, our firm is back in communication with an important new feature. At a time when companies are facing increasingly important challenges, we present our entire team: a single team that includes not only De Luca & Partners’ Labour Lawyers, but also the Labour Consultants of our subsidiary HR Capital S.r.l..
Ready to go again but with what rules?
The National Labour Inspectorate provides detailed instructions to the territorial inspectorates to undertake checks on compliance with the contents of the protocol shared between the Government and the social partners on 14 March 2020 and on compliance with the precautionary measures to be taken for the safety of workplaces and workers. Vittorio De Luca, Antonella Iacobellis and Martina De Angeli analyse for Guida al Lavoro of Il Sole 24 Ore the operational guidelines to manage Phase 2.
Click here to read the DLP insights related to the matter and the considerations of the Firm.
In order to facilitate the activity of the Prefects at a decisive moment such as that of the so-called Phase 2, the National Labour Inspectorate (“INL”), on 20 April 2020, published note no. 149 (“Note INL no. 149”), with which it provides a real operating guide for its territorial offices, to contribute, at the request of the Prefectures, to the necessary checks on the occurrence of the conditions provided for the prosecution – in case where it is permitted – of production, industrial and commercial activities, with a view to indispensable synergy in the management of the current pandemic emergency.
These requests are in response to the circular of the Ministry of the Interior dated 14 April 2020, prot. no. 15350/117 (Annex A to the INL Note no. 149) which provides clarifications regarding the D.P.C.M. 10 April 2020 and which, among other things, highlights the need for the Prefectures to request the collaboration of the competent services of the Local Health Authorities (“ASL”) and the support of the INL’s territorial articulation, for the purposes of control:
Source: full italian version published on Guida al lavoro – Il Sole 24 ore.
The National Labour Inspectorate (“INL”) issued two notes, one shortly after the other, used to provide the first clarifications concerning the inspection procedures for worksites in light of the pertinent guidelines, shared in the “Joint Protocol on regulation of measures for contrasting and containing the spread of the Covid-19 virus” (the “Protocol”) signed by the stakeholders on 14 March 2020 (recently updated last 24 April).
Note 131 of 10 April 2020
Note no. 131 of 10 April 2020 has the objective of making workplace conduct uniform and consistent including due to the evolution of the pertinent emergency regulatory framework. A regulatory framework which, as should be recalled, has:
According to the INL inspection activity will be primarily focussed on implementation procedures, by the employers, of organisational and management procedures set up by the authorities and subject matter of the aforesaid Protocol.
It was further explained that the professionalism of the inspectors may be useful also in terms facilitation, mediation, deflation and verification of the processes for using public resources dedicated to support for families, workers, companies and credit, such as those to access social safety nets.
Note 149 of 20 April 2020
With the subsequent note no. 149 of 20 April 2020, INL provided further explanations concerning its inspectors’ control procedures on observance of the conditions required to continue production, industrial and commercial activities.
The note states that the Inspectors must perform inspection activities in close collaboration with the competent offices of the Local Healthcare Agencies, and with which they must previously establish a plan containing lists of companies to focus controls on. This is also envisaged to make it easier to correctly identify the objectives to pursue. However, should the inspectors find themselves faced with clear violations of a certain seriousness and urgency, requiring immediate on-site inspections, they may still perform them even without compliance with the aforesaid procedure.
In addition, the note specifies that for these types of inspections, the selection of inspectors to use must primarily be done on a voluntary basis and, above all, they must be provided with personal protection equipment suitable for the purpose.
Lastly, the note contains annexes such as (i) “guidelines for inspections on the anti-contagion protocol”, (ii) a report form for access and inspection entitled “Covid-19”, (iii) a list of personal protection equipment (PPE), with relative instructions for use for inspection personnel and, lastly, (iv) a check list with the inspections to perform; this is a type of questionnaire with yes/no answers to be filled out by the inspector.
In terms of punishment, if the inspectors find failure to comply with one or more of the prevention measures in the “Protocol”, they will not proceed by imposing a sanction on the employer. They must transmit the results of the inspection to the competent Prefecture, i.e. the access report and filled in check list, summarising the omissions and/or failures they found for adoption of any pertinent measures. It is then up to the Prefecture, based on this report, to adopt any measures, including of an interdictory nature, applied to the company.
INAIL conducted a study concerning the correct measures to adopt in the area of work organisation during the time of COVID-19 which later resulted in the “Technical document on the possible redesign of containment measures for SARS-CoV-2 in workplaces and strategies and prevention” (the “Technical Document”).
The Technical Document is aimed at providing the political operator, i.e. the Government, with information including of a statistical nature useful for making an assessment aimed at determining the progressive intervention priority levels on restarting production activities during the much heralded “Phase 2”, as well as intervention strategies to implement in workplaces.
The Document in question is mainly composed of two parts:
Examining the second part, the main measures mentioned therein are outlined below:
The Technical Document recommends the importance of creating a redesign of spaces, work hours, organisation of shifts, as well as production processes in the workplace, aimed at social distancing and, in particular to:
In line with the risk assessment and management processes governed by Legislative Decree 81/2008, measures of a general and specific nature must be adopted commensurate with the SARS-CoV-2 exposure risk in workplaces, giving priority to primary prevention measures and, in particular:
During the transition period, the risk of reactivation of outbreaks in workplaces needs to be considered, thus putting into place a series of measures aimed at contrasting them and, in particular:
◊◊◊◊
The measures indicated in the Technical Document – which are basically in line with those contained in the Guidelines published on 16 April 2020 by the European Agency for safety and health at work – are quoted in the Protocol as updated on 24 April 2020.