Case Law

Court of Cassation, with sentence no. 8611 of April 9, 2013, stated that the employer’s statements included in the injury denunciation report may have a value of confession because in the trial they can be used against the employer to the purpose of the ascertainment of liability regarding the injury suffered by the employee.

The Supreme Court, with sentence no. 7925 published on April 2, stated that mobbing may be ascertained by the labor judge only in case of oppressive acts against the employee.

Court of Cassation, Criminal Section, with sentence no. 11442 of March 11, 2013, stated that the proxy on hygiene and safety at work is effective when the subject who gives the powers specifies the tasks of the delegated.

Court of Cassation, with sentence no. 7829 of March 28, 2013, confirmed that the bahaviour of a bank’s employee who leaves the cash desk unattended for the coffee break represents just cause for dismissal.

The Court of Cassation with sentence no. 5143 of March 1, confirmed the statement of sentence no. 12257/2012 according to which the criterium provided by the agreement with the Unions for the choice of the employees to be dismissed can be just one and it can be represented by the imminence of retirement, if it allows to make a strict classification and it can be applied and controlled without employer’s discretional choice.